|
|
Post by stephenswinkler on Dec 1, 2017 14:12:22 GMT -5
beachguy, your mother must be so ashamed of you, reading your immature posts. Adults do not downgrade an individual for their looks. You would be banned from any classroom for downgrading another man's religion. Jackie would not approve of your gay bashing. Me? I look upon you as an empty-headed idiot with brains one degree less than a moron. That would place you into the Donald Trump category of the mentally unsound and confused.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beachguy on Dec 2, 2017 12:56:00 GMT -5
beachguy, your mother must be so ashamed of you, reading your immature posts. Adults do not downgrade an individual for their looks. You would be banned from any classroom for downgrading another man's religion. Jackie would not approve of your gay bashing. Me? I look upon you as an empty-headed idiot with brains one degree less than a moron. That would place you into the Donald Trump category of the mentally unsound and confused. Yes , 7 more years of killing dirty dogs as you , look at you , yikes !!!!!! the chubby kid in the school yards crying for mommy . |
|
|
|
Post by Beachguy on Dec 2, 2017 12:58:29 GMT -5
U.S.Good Morning America Hunter who says he mistook woman for a deer charged with manslaughter. Careful you don't get shot as a mistook man . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2017 0:34:27 GMT -5
Friday Bridge, Mary Jo Kopechne is having great fun in the Afterlife. I, myself, cannot wait to get to the Hereafter. Of course, your reward is greater, if you die in battle with the enemy. Unfortunately for Mary Jo, she did not have the glorious opportunity for this great event. Her family missed her greatly in this life. She died in terror, much too young, at the hands of another, and you joking about it is in extremely poor taste. Upon your death, my guess is that your "humor" will not be missed. Maybe you'll have better luck in your afterlife, but I doubt it. |
|
|
|
Post by richard on Dec 5, 2017 21:50:13 GMT -5
Friday Bridge, Mary Jo Kopechne is having great fun in the Afterlife. I, myself, cannot wait to get to the Hereafter. Of course, your reward is greater, if you die in battle with the enemy. Unfortunately for Mary Jo, she did not have the glorious opportunity for this great event. Her family missed her greatly in this life. She died in terror, much too young, at the hands of another, and you joking about it is in extremely poor taste. Upon your death, my guess is that your "humor" will not be missed. Maybe you'll have better luck in your afterlife, but I doubt it. I would love to see a picture of the Jury, from what I understand they completely blamed the gun as being to easy to shoot. I could see an idiot accidentally firing it once but not 3 time. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2017 23:49:43 GMT -5
Her family missed her greatly in this life. She died in terror, much too young, at the hands of another, and you joking about it is in extremely poor taste. Upon your death, my guess is that your "humor" will not be missed. Maybe you'll have better luck in your afterlife, but I doubt it. I would love to see a picture of the Jury, from what I understand they completely blamed the gun as being to easy to shoot. I could see an idiot accidentally firing it once but not 3 time. I would have hated to find out the full story [had I been a juror on the Steinle case] and that critical information was withheld from me. I would feel like I unwittingly participated in a second crime against her. I don't see how they failed to convict him on involuntary manslaughter charges. He caused the death of Kate Steinle when he fired the gun, regardless of his intent. There is no free pass for that, in California or in my state. AND, IF THEY KNEW he was a convicted felon, the charge would automatically be upgraded to murder. [Juries are often not permitted to hear about prior bad acts, as it can be prejudicial]. I don't know how or where the courts draw the line on this sort of issue. |
|
|
|
Post by agog on Dec 6, 2017 10:46:48 GMT -5
Her family missed her greatly in this life. She died in terror, much too young, at the hands of another, and you joking about it is in extremely poor taste. Upon your death, my guess is that your "humor" will not be missed. Maybe you'll have better luck in your afterlife, but I doubt it. I would love to see a picture of the Jury, from what I understand they completely blamed the gun as being to easy to shoot. I could see an idiot accidentally firing it once but not 3 time. Your's is the first report I've read saying the weapon was fired more than the one time I simply assumed only one shot from the lack of mention of multiple discharges in the press. Are you sure? |
|
|
|
Post by agog on Dec 6, 2017 11:26:21 GMT -5
I would love to see a picture of the Jury, from what I understand they completely blamed the gun as being to easy to shoot. I could see an idiot accidentally firing it once but not 3 time. I would have hated to find out the full story [had I been a juror on the Steinle case] and that critical information was withheld from me. I would feel like I unwittingly participated in a second crime against her. I don't see how they failed to convict him on involuntary manslaughter charges. He caused the death of Kate Steinle when he fired the gun, regardless of his intent. There is no free pass for that, in California or in my state. AND, IF THEY KNEW he was a convicted felon, the charge would automatically be upgraded to murder. [Juries are often not permitted to hear about prior bad acts, as it can be prejudicial]. I don't know how or where the courts draw the line on this sort of issue. Each outrage against expected American norms awaken more people. Often the problem is learning about events that show 'favored' groups behaving unacceptably. Across Western nations, elites and those who aspire to be elite seem to have marching orders to repress information contradicting the narrative that second, third and fourth world people are, or soon can be made into a benefit for first world peoples and societies. More and more people, when confronted with facts instead of the approved propaganda are questioning the motives of the information suppressors. What is the end game? Cui bono? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2017 14:20:57 GMT -5
I would have hated to find out the full story [had I been a juror on the Steinle case] and that critical information was withheld from me. I would feel like I unwittingly participated in a second crime against her. I don't see how they failed to convict him on involuntary manslaughter charges. He caused the death of Kate Steinle when he fired the gun, regardless of his intent. There is no free pass for that, in California or in my state. AND, IF THEY KNEW he was a convicted felon, the charge would automatically be upgraded to murder. [Juries are often not permitted to hear about prior bad acts, as it can be prejudicial]. I don't know how or where the courts draw the line on this sort of issue. Each outrage against expected American norms awaken more people. Often the problem is learning about events that show 'favored' groups behaving unacceptably. Across Western nations, elites and those who aspire to be elite seem to have marching orders to repress information contradicting the narrative that second, third and fourth world people are, or soon can be made into a benefit for first world peoples and societies. More and more people, when confronted with facts instead of the approved propaganda are questioning the motives of the information suppressors. What is the end game? Cui bono? The End Game? Don't know. What scares me? We have been unbelievably open bordered for the last 16 years. We have not properly vetted who is here now. I've been told that 12% of the population is not Republican OR Democrat, but rather a Globalist or Socialist within the Democratic Party. I'm from Minnesota. There, they have the Democrat/Farmer/Labor party [The DFL]. However, in the last election, I'm told the farmer and laborer were being ignored by their very own uber-liberal politicians! Children today see schools, TV, and news broadcasts. The Education process today is heavily liberal, Entertainment industry is extremely liberal. News is heavily liberal. The youth of our country are being taught to THINK liberal. To me, Liberal means socialist. Not the big bad Commie type, but the type that wants an equitable division of wealth. In terms of Economic systems, while Capitalism and Socialism are polar opposites, there IS a [much happier] middle ground, and "We the people" have been heading in that direction for years. For some people, we've been going too fast, but for others, too slowly. Putin must be laughing his as off. He has everyone chasing their tails over election tampering, but really, what proportion of the 12% Globalists and Socialists are Russian sponsored activists herding our snowflake kids and grandkids pellmell down Putin's path? Activists who don't even know they themselves have been herded down that path? I am sure we [as a nation] will get more socially sensitive over time. That is inevitable, but at the rate of speed as is appropriate. Considering the difficulty we are now having with the "Deep State", I want to make sure we are on a solid footing. After 16 years of Clinton and Obama, we have an IRS we can't trust, and an FBI we can't trust, a State department that is infested with political cabals and can't be trusted, and even bureaucracies that are unaccountable to ANYONE in Government that are wildly political. That can't be allowed to continue. THIS is my End Game. Get the IRS, the FBI, Justice, State and everyone else back on the straight and narrow. We [as a country] are now facing Eisenhower's "Military/Industrial Complex" gone berserk, and now on Steroids, and this is what is now infecting our Goverment institutions! |
|
|
|
Post by stephenswinkler on Dec 7, 2017 14:21:18 GMT -5
Liberal does not mean socialist. How stupid can you be? If that were the case, then Norman Thomas the Socialist would not have ran against Franklin Roosevelt the liberal. Liberal means taking care of people by the proper regulation of capitalism, not the replacement of capitalism. Liberalism created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for the protection of your bank deposits. Socialism would have taken over the banks. Liberalism created the Civilian Conservation Corps to give economic opportunity to youth and to conserve our environment. Liberalism also created the Agricultural Adjustment Administration of Franklin Roosevelt the Democrat, which incidentally, was an improvement over the Federal Farm Board established under the Agricultural Marketing Act signed into law by Herbert Hoover the Republican. So you see, Republicans can be good liberals too, if they do not have mental illness like Donald Trump.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beachguy on Dec 7, 2017 14:28:05 GMT -5
Liberal does not mean socialist. How stupid can you be? If that were the case, then Norman Thomas the Socialist would not have ran against Franklin Roosevelt the liberal. Liberal means taking care of people by the proper regulation of capitalism, not the replacement of capitalism. Liberalism created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for the protection of your bank deposits. Socialism would have taken over the banks. Liberalism created the Civilian Conservation Corps to give economic opportunity to youth and to conserve our environment. Liberalism also created the Agricultural Adjustment Administration of Franklin Roosevelt the Democrat, which incidentally, was an improvement over the Federal Farm Board established under the Agricultural Marketing Act signed into law by Herbert Hoover the Republican. So you see, Republicans can be good liberals too, if they do not have mental illness like Donald Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MAGA>>>>>>wait till you see what is coming to the Liberals from the FBI . ho ho ho the rig is up and so be the rope . |
|
|
|
Post by stephenswinkler on Dec 7, 2017 14:57:11 GMT -5
I prefer the beheading of beachguy rather than the hanging of beachguy. No wonder, you were banned from another site.
|
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Dec 7, 2017 15:59:14 GMT -5
Friday Bridge, Mary Jo Kopechne is having great fun in the Afterlife. I, myself, cannot wait to get to the Hereafter. Of course, your reward is greater, if you die in battle with the enemy. Unfortunately for Mary Jo, she did not have the glorious opportunity for this great event. Last I checked, adultery is not rewarded conduct except in Hollywood (which is not in charge of any version of the afterlife I ever heard of), not even if some vermin of a Kennedy (disgusting misogynists, at least as far back as old Joe) left you to die. And the least Teddy should have been charged with was negligent homicide. As for dying in battle, I suspect you'd wet yourself. But my view of battle is quite different: win by surviving if at all possible, and making darn sure that no combatant enemy of the west survives to return to battle. Not glory, just taking out the trash. Liberty - even liberty to behave in all manner of ways that many might find offensive, so long as not actually assaulting them or stealing from them - is, along with the lives of family and community, one of very few principles worth defending, and God doesn't need assassins (look where that word came from) or enforcers; if he exists, and wanted to be rid of a bunch of people, it would just happen, and if he wanted to compel them to change rather than to invite them to do so freely, he probably could do that too, although since free will has been tolerated thus far, either he doesn't exist, or he doesn't work like that. It is strange how the irony of murdering in God's name has escaped so many people. |
|
gordy
Full Member
Posts: 246
|
Post by gordy on Dec 7, 2017 23:02:45 GMT -5
Friday Bridge, Mary Jo Kopechne is having great fun in the Afterlife. I, myself, cannot wait to get to the Hereafter. Of course, your reward is greater, if you die in battle with the enemy. Unfortunately for Mary Jo, she did not have the glorious opportunity for this great event. Last I checked, adultery is not rewarded conduct except in Hollywood (which is not in charge of any version of the afterlife I ever heard of), not even if some vermin of a Kennedy (disgusting misogynists, at least as far back as old Joe) left you to die. And the least Teddy should have been charged with was negligent homicide. As for dying in battle, I suspect you'd wet yourself. But my view of battle is quite different: win by surviving if at all possible, and making darn sure that no combatant enemy of the west survives to return to battle. Not glory, just taking out the trash. Liberty - even liberty to behave in all manner of ways that many might find offensive, so long as not actually assaulting them or stealing from them - is, along with the lives of family and community, one of very few principles worth defending, and God doesn't need assassins (look where that word came from) or enforcers; if he exists, and wanted to be rid of a bunch of people, it would just happen, and if he wanted to compel them to change rather than to invite them to do so freely, he probably could do that too, although since free will has been tolerated thus far, either he doesn't exist, or he doesn't work like that. It is strange how the irony of murdering in God's name has escaped so many people. I fear that there may be others that believe no combatant enemy of the east survives or goes unpunished to return to battle. I would imagine that N Korea is not about to back-off from threats thrown their way by someone that is appearing many countries to be more unstable everyday. If you keep wandering around poking people in the eye then at some point the role will be reversed. |
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Dec 8, 2017 1:04:25 GMT -5
I fear that there may be others that believe no combatant enemy of the east survives or goes unpunished to return to battle. I would imagine that N Korea is not about to back-off from threats thrown their way by someone that is appearing many countries to be more unstable everyday. If you keep wandering around poking people in the eye then at some point the role will be reversed. There is _no_ moral equivalence between Kim Jong-un and Trump. All three Kims have demonstrated a will to provoke not just by words, but by deeds, as much as is unopposed. Their goal is not simply to be left alone, but to (a) rule the entirety of Korea, and (b) to be respected as a world power. Their rule is a nightmare (look at the nighttime satellite map of the Korean peninsula, where the north is nearly dark) that should not be expanded, and there is absolutely nothing in the _quality_ of their conduct that is worthy of respect. Trump may be brash and obnoxious in mannerism, but in practice, he's no worse that his predecessors, and indeed would probably prefer to reduce rather than increase military interventions, although as most discover when they're actually in the job, the circumstances and reasons for those are often more complex, and the ramifications of disengaging far less straightforward, than they appeared before that point, and to disengage without making matters worse takes far more than just the desire and issuing the orders. |
|
