|
|
Post by Outhouse on Aug 2, 2020 18:24:02 GMT -5
We can expect you to continue relying on people like OANN. Almost as bad as Tucker Carlson. This is the organization that OANN reported about: The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons aapsonline.org/OANN was reporting on actual studies on Hydroxychloroquine. To see the list of studies, you can go here: c19study.com/The data revealed the following results about the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine  Do you think you can excuse OANN for reporting on actual scientific research? Actual scientific research?? Try again. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_SurgeonsThe Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a conservative non-profit association founded in 1944. The group was reported to have about 5,000 members in 2014. The association has promoted a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is a causal relationship between vaccines and autism. It is opposed to the Affordable Care Act and other forms of universal health insurance. |
|
|
|
Post by Gust on Aug 2, 2020 18:27:20 GMT -5
This is the organization that OANN reported about: The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons aapsonline.org/OANN was reporting on actual studies on Hydroxychloroquine. To see the list of studies, you can go here: c19study.com/The data revealed the following results about the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Do you think you can excuse OANN for reporting on actual scientific research? Actual scientific research?? Try again. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_SurgeonsThe Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a conservative non-profit association founded in 1944. The group was reported to have about 5,000 members in 2014. The association has promoted a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is a causal relationship between vaccines and autism. It is opposed to the Affordable Care Act and other forms of universal health insurance. All of those things referenced are true, so? |
|
|
|
Post by Outhouse on Aug 2, 2020 18:28:27 GMT -5
Quote:
Publishing of non-mainstream or scientifically discredited claims
Articles and commentaries published in the journal have argued a number of non-mainstream or scientifically discredited claims,[24] including:
that human activity has not contributed to climate change, and that global warming will be beneficial and thus is not a cause for concern.[30][31]
that HIV does not cause AIDS.[32]
that the "gay male lifestyle" shortens life expectancy by 20 years.[33]
that there is a link between abortion and the risk of breast cancer.[3]
that there are possible links between autism and vaccinations.[3]
that government efforts to encourage smoking cessation and emphasize the addictiveness of nicotine are misguided.[34]
A series of articles by anti-abortion authors published in the journal argued for a link between abortion and breast cancer.[35][36] Such a link has been rejected by the scientific community, including the U.S. National Cancer Institute,[37] the American Cancer Society,[38] and the World Health Organization,[39] among other major medical bodies.[40]
A 2003 paper published in the journal, claiming that vaccination was harmful, was criticized for poor methodology, lack of scientific rigor, and outright errors by the World Health Organization[41] and the American Academy of Pediatrics.[42] A National Public Radio piece mentioned inaccurate information published in the Journal and said: "The journal itself is not considered a leading publication, as it's put out by an advocacy group that opposes most government involvement in medical care."[43]
The journal has also published articles advocating politically and socially conservative policy positions, including:
that the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are unconstitutional;[44]
that "humanists" have conspired to replace the "creation religion of Jehovah" with evolution;[45]
that "anchor babies" are valuable to undocumented immigrants, particularly if the babies are disabled.[24]
The organization published on its website an article claiming that Obama hypnotized audiences with his speeches, using "extra slow speech, rhythm, tonalities, vagueness, visual imagery, metaphor, and raising of emotion." The "O" in Obama's logo was compared to a crystal ball used as a "point of visual fixation".[34]
|
|
|
|
Post by Gust on Aug 2, 2020 19:25:54 GMT -5
Quote: Publishing of non-mainstream or scientifically discredited claims Articles and commentaries published in the journal have argued a number of non-mainstream or scientifically discredited claims,[24] including: that human activity has not contributed to climate change, and that global warming will be beneficial and thus is not a cause for concern.[30][31] that HIV does not cause AIDS.[32] that the "gay male lifestyle" shortens life expectancy by 20 years.[33] that there is a link between abortion and the risk of breast cancer.[3] that there are possible links between autism and vaccinations.[3] that government efforts to encourage smoking cessation and emphasize the addictiveness of nicotine are misguided.[34] A series of articles by anti-abortion authors published in the journal argued for a link between abortion and breast cancer.[35][36] Such a link has been rejected by the scientific community, including the U.S. National Cancer Institute,[37] the American Cancer Society,[38] and the World Health Organization,[39] among other major medical bodies.[40] A 2003 paper published in the journal, claiming that vaccination was harmful, was criticized for poor methodology, lack of scientific rigor, and outright errors by the World Health Organization[41] and the American Academy of Pediatrics.[42] A National Public Radio piece mentioned inaccurate information published in the Journal and said: "The journal itself is not considered a leading publication, as it's put out by an advocacy group that opposes most government involvement in medical care."[43] The journal has also published articles advocating politically and socially conservative policy positions, including: that the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are unconstitutional;[44] that "humanists" have conspired to replace the "creation religion of Jehovah" with evolution;[45] that "anchor babies" are valuable to undocumented immigrants, particularly if the babies are disabled.[24] The organization published on its website an article claiming that Obama hypnotized audiences with his speeches, using "extra slow speech, rhythm, tonalities, vagueness, visual imagery, metaphor, and raising of emotion." The "O" in Obama's logo was compared to a crystal ball used as a "point of visual fixation".[34] Um, Wikipedia? The place where anyone can go in and edit articles, but is run by lefties? |
|
|
|
Post by Gust on Aug 2, 2020 19:47:03 GMT -5
Just for sake of calming down the discussion a little bit, please do enlighten me about the liberal belief system and why you think that people like me should want to fall in line. From my perspective, it's hard to get excited about liberalism.
In my view, liberal policies:
-are against law and order (see the current riots and the desire to defund law enforcement as an example) -are pro open borders (even though this policy hurts minorities that are here already) -are anti-life (abortion is a prime example. I am against the death penalty. Democrat Virginia governor is also in favor of infanticide) -are anti-family (read the BLM "what we believe" page) -are anti small business (democratic mayors and governors have closed small businesses, but have allowed large corporations such as Walmart to continue to function)
-are anti-religion (too many examples to cite) -are history revisionists (see the tearing down of statues) -are anti worker (the guaranteed minimum wage will put many people out of work) -are pro higher income taxes (I want them lowered to keep more of what I earn) -are for the destruction of a moral culture (see the photo below)
Please help me get excited about Joe Biden, AOC, Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi or any of those folks. What am I missing? Refrain from bashing Trump in the process because you should be able to say why adopting liberal policies will help improve our lives, our family's lives and those of future generations.
Drag-queen demon reads to kids at Michelle Obama Library
This is what liberalism brings. Should I get excited about it? Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
Post by Outhouse on Aug 2, 2020 20:13:20 GMT -5
Um, Wikipedia? The place where anyone can go in and edit articles, but is run by lefties? It is clear that you have no knowledge of nor any idea about how Wikipedia operates. Yes. Judging by your post, you are missing a working brain. Just relax and drink some more Kool-Aid. We'll wake you up when the madness is all behind us. |
|
|
|
Post by Gust on Aug 2, 2020 20:16:58 GMT -5
Um, Wikipedia? The place where anyone can go in and edit articles, but is run by lefties? It is clear that you have no knowledge of nor any idea about how Wikipedia operates. Yes. Judging by your post, you are missing a working brain. Just relax and drink some more Kool-Aid. We'll wake you up when the madness is all behind us. Now I am very excited about Joe Biden - thank you! My missing brain will make sure to help me pull the lever for him in November. |
|
|
|
Post by Outhouse on Aug 2, 2020 20:28:22 GMT -5
Despite Trump's efforts to undermine confidence in the voting process (the foundation of our democracy), you should anticipate voting by mail-in ballot. Going to a polling place to pull a lever could result in Covid-19.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1 Guest on Aug 2, 2020 20:33:25 GMT -5
This is the organization that OANN reported about: The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons aapsonline.org/OANN was reporting on actual studies on Hydroxychloroquine. To see the list of studies, you can go here: c19study.com/The data revealed the following results about the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Do you think you can excuse OANN for reporting on actual scientific research? Actual scientific research?? Try again. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_SurgeonsThe Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a conservative non-profit association founded in 1944. The group was reported to have about 5,000 members in 2014. The association has promoted a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is a causal relationship between vaccines and autism. It is opposed to the Affordable Care Act and other forms of universal health insurance. If you had the pay the UnAffordable Healthcare policies, you'd be opposed to it too but you're probably on Medicaid. |
|
|
|
Post by Outhouse on Aug 2, 2020 20:36:52 GMT -5
If you had the pay the UnAffordable Healthcare policies, you'd be opposed to it too but you're probably on Medicaid. Speak English. |
|
|
|
Post by 1 Guest on Aug 2, 2020 20:39:14 GMT -5
Um, Wikipedia? The place where anyone can go in and edit articles, but is run by lefties? Yes. Judging by your post, you are missing a working brain. Just relax and drink some more Kool-Aid. We'll wake you up when the madness is all behind us. No, it's clear that you have no idea how Wiki operates and how easy it is to make changes there. Look it up. |
|
|
|
Post by 1 Guest on Aug 2, 2020 20:42:13 GMT -5
If you had the pay the UnAffordable Healthcare policies, you'd be opposed to it too but you're probably on Medicaid. Speak English. I'm sorry if that's another one that went right over your head. |
|
|
|
Post by Outhouse on Aug 2, 2020 20:43:25 GMT -5
No, it's clear that you have no idea how Wiki operates and how easy it is to make changes there. Look it up. Any edits to Wikipedia are subject to being reverted if they can't be supported by reliable sources. |
|
|
|
Post by Outhouse on Aug 2, 2020 20:45:05 GMT -5
I'm sorry if that's another one that went right over your head. Read it again. |
|
|
|
Post by Gust on Aug 2, 2020 20:46:35 GMT -5
Despite Trump's efforts to undermine confidence in the voting process (the foundation of our democracy), you should anticipate voting by mail-in ballot. Going to a polling place to pull a lever could result in Covid-19. But rioting in the streets is safe? |
|
