|
Post by donkey on Sept 14, 2024 19:05:52 GMT -5
they'll vote for a rock, as long as it's a democrat rock. It doesn't have to be a democrat rock, any rock will do. A rock has never been convicted of grabbing pussies. A rock wouldn't ask its Vice President to invalidate a national election. A rock wouldn't pardon the Jan 6 rioters. A rock wouldn't have appointed judges to invalidate Roe v Wade. A rock wouldn't claim to have won the 2020 election without credible evidence. A rock wouldn't deny climate change in the face of overwhelming evidence. I would have seriously considered voting for Nikki Haley since I don't think she would have done any of the above things. lol...everything you just listed there isn't what this election is about. It's about the undecided independent voters in the seven swing states, and the failures of the current administration: high prices, high crime, and a wide-open border. Then, to a lesser extent...wokeness gone made, and multiple proxy wars. Trump gave us peace and prosperity. But I agree with Harris...America wants change, and change entails the current administration being tossed out of the White House (I mean, what kind of idiot runs on change, when her administration has been in power the last four years?)
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Sept 14, 2024 19:07:54 GMT -5
Sniveling cowards don't react with defiance to being shot at. Harris on the other hand usually answers questions with anything other than an actual answer, like she's either not got answers, or knows that honestly saying what she'd do would finish her off with everyone other than commie fringe nutjobs. Democrats are unfit to hold any public office. Even dog catcher would be too much, they'd probably send the dogs to Springfield, OH. (and no, I don't want one party; conservatives are legitimate, but so are libertarians, although they're a bit naive) Trump is clearly fearless, even with the ultimate test of being shot at. That must drive TDSers crazy. lol
|
|
Non-Serious Candidate
Guest
|
Post by Non-Serious Candidate on Sept 14, 2024 19:13:31 GMT -5
She could just sit on her lead and ride it to the election in seven weeks. Exactly. The difference is that Harris wants to go for the jugular and finish off the Pussy Grabber. Trump wants to sit on his pussy grabbing ass and ride it out like the sniveling coward he is.
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Sept 14, 2024 19:16:29 GMT -5
The Pussy Grabber went through a Primary and knocked all the other candidates out, Harris didn't. The Pussy Grabber agreed to the ABC debate, knowing how it would go down, considering Harris's best friend runs the show and the moderators were hard core democrats. Harris didn't show up for the Fox debate, she chickened out even though she was going to spew one lie after the other and give no specifics on what she was going to do. She still hasn't. And the Pussy Grabber didn't knock up his babysitter, Harris's husband did, but he couldn't man up and marry her because, oh, that's right, he was already married. So yeah, actions speak louder than words. Please pay attention. The issue is that the Pussy Grabber knows he lost the debate and is too much of a sniveling coward to face Harris again. Nothing you posted has anything to do with that issue. Harris may have baited Trump some, but Trump ultimately won. He kept returning to the economy, crime, and the border, the current chaos around the world, and his closing statement was awesome. She wasted everyone's time trying to "trigger" Trump, and avoided meaningful, policy discussion...which she desperately needed to do. So she ultimately failed. That's why there was little to no movement in the post debate polls for her. She's an empty shell, a scripted idiot, who is clearly totally unqualified to be president. She came across as fake and way out of her depth. Trump came across as experienced and caring about the actual issues that are affecting Americans every day.
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Sept 14, 2024 19:18:15 GMT -5
She could just sit on her lead and ride it to the election in seven weeks. Exactly. The difference is that Harris wants to go for the jugular and finish off the Pussy Grabber. Trump wants to sit on his pussy grabbing ass and ride it out like the sniveling coward he is. Trump's infinitely more brave than you. He got shot, and got up with his fist in the air shouting "fight!", and iconic moment. If that had been you, you would have run home screaming for mommy. ROFL
|
|
Non-Serious Candidate
Guest
|
Post by Non-Serious Candidate on Sept 14, 2024 19:27:08 GMT -5
Sniveling cowards don't react with defiance to being shot at. But sniveling cowards are too chicken to face their opponents in a man to man debate after losing the first debate. Or, should I say, a woman to chicken debate.
|
|
Non-Serious Candidate
Guest
|
Post by Non-Serious Candidate on Sept 14, 2024 19:33:14 GMT -5
Trump is clearly fearless, even with the ultimate test of being shot at. Obviously, facing Harris in a second debate is far more terrifying.
|
|
Non-Serious Candidate
Guest
|
Post by Non-Serious Candidate on Sept 14, 2024 19:35:58 GMT -5
She's an empty shell, a scripted idiot, who is clearly totally unqualified to be president. She came across as fake and way out of her depth. Trump came across as experienced and caring about the actual issues that are affecting Americans every day. So why is the Pussy Grabber so terrified of facing her again?
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Sept 14, 2024 19:52:01 GMT -5
She's an empty shell, a scripted idiot, who is clearly totally unqualified to be president. She came across as fake and way out of her depth. Trump came across as experienced and caring about the actual issues that are affecting Americans every day. So why is the Pussy Grabber so terrified of facing her again? You seem awfully drilled down on the "Pussy Grabber" thing. Are you hoping that Trump grabs yours? ROFL
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Sept 14, 2024 19:53:35 GMT -5
Trump is clearly fearless, even with the ultimate test of being shot at. Obviously, facing Harris in a second debate is far more terrifying. lol...orrrr...he doesn't want to waste everyone's time with another 90 minutes of Comrade Harris cringe with zero substance.
|
|
Non-Serious Candidate
Guest
|
Post by Non-Serious Candidate on Sept 14, 2024 19:59:41 GMT -5
You seem awfully drilled down on the "Pussy Grabber" thing. I am inspired by all the invective directed against Harris on this forum and wanted to address Trump properly. Are you hoping that Trump grabs yours? Yes. I am hoping for the $5M payoff.
|
|
Non-Serious Candidate
Guest
|
Post by Non-Serious Candidate on Sept 14, 2024 20:23:36 GMT -5
Obviously, facing Harris in a second debate is far more terrifying. lol...orrrr...he doesn't want to waste everyone's time with another 90 minutes of Comrade Harris cringe with zero substance. 67M viewers watched Harris-Trump, far more than the 53M viewers for Biden-Trump. Clearly most of the nation did not consider it a waste of time. As everyone knows, the Pussy Grabber is a publicity whore who is obsessed with adoring crowds. There is no way that he would ever give up the chance to be seen by 67M more viewers. Unless he is terrified by the prospect of being humiliated by Harris ... again.
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Sept 14, 2024 20:42:45 GMT -5
The only sense in which Harris won anything is that (a) it was given to her by the biased "moderators" who also gave her the questions in advance, ane (b) she outperformed very low expectations and didn't totally implode. And maybe (c) she may have fooled some people into thinking she's not as spineless as she actually is.
She's the real coward, never done a tough interview with an adversarial rather than friendly interviewer. She had her emotional support person, her fellow marxist VP choice, along on the last one. She will never answer a question honestly because either she doesn't know, or she knows the majority doesn't want the answer that would be honest about what she would do. All the things she says she'd fix, she could have at least TRIED to fix in the last not quite four years.
Other than that, she is the same clueless blithering marxist she's always been.
And all Democrats seeking or holding office are either traitors or fools as most of them other than Truman have always been.
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Sept 14, 2024 20:57:17 GMT -5
I am inspired by all the invective directed against Harris on this forum and wanted to address Trump properly. Democrat politicians are evil traitors or delusional fools. There is not enough invective in the universe to properly describe how bad they are. They do not belong among free people.
|
|
Non-Serious Candidate
Guest
|
Post by Non-Serious Candidate on Sept 14, 2024 21:02:03 GMT -5
gave her the questions in advance Can you provide evidence of this? she is the same clueless blithering marxist she's always been. Quite right. Luckily she is up against a pussy grabber who she has already beaten at debate and who is too terrified to face her again.
|
|