djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 20, 2020 16:31:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Pin the Tail on Apr 20, 2020 19:50:07 GMT -5
DJT2020?? Fact check?? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 20, 2020 20:58:05 GMT -5
With the endless lies coming from the Globalist about their covid-19. I have stopped worring about it. |
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 20, 2020 21:29:59 GMT -5
Dr. Fauci said he doesn't think we should ever shake hands again, but when it comes to sex with a stranger, he says that's your choice. |
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 20, 2020 22:01:36 GMT -5
New York Times EDIT: Hannity wrong about Fauci, he is scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Guest 5 on Apr 20, 2020 22:24:04 GMT -5
New York Times EDIT: Hannity wrong about Fauci, he is scum. Why is Hannity covering for Fauci? Fauci is as low as they get. |
|
|
|
Post by 1 Guest on Apr 20, 2020 22:36:05 GMT -5
Well there's plenty of room in the jails, the criminals are walking the streets. I wonder if they're wearing masks and following social distance. LOL. |
|
|
|
Post by 1 Guest on Apr 20, 2020 22:40:06 GMT -5
New York Times EDIT: Hannity wrong about Fauci, he is scum. Why is Hannity covering for Fauci? Fauci is as low as they get. Yup. On March 9 the scum bag said it was okay for healthy people to go on a cruise, yet he was sure that something like the Wuhan Virus would surprise everyone during the Trump administration. Something very, very fishy about him considering he's practically attached to Gates at the hip. They keep asking the Pres. if he's listening to his advisors. Unfortunately he was, except for initializing the travel ban. He did that on his own. |
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 20, 2020 22:41:53 GMT -5
South Dakota did not shut down A small population, 2019 - 884,659. Deaths supposedly from coronavirus ... S E V E N |
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 20, 2020 23:24:38 GMT -5
Chinese affiliated drone company donated drones to aid Globalist controlled politicians, and themselves in spying on Americans. EDIT: HELL just watch the whole show. |
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Apr 20, 2020 23:26:08 GMT -5
Chinese affiliated drone company donated drones to aid Globalist controlled politicians, and themselves to spy on Americans. Ok, maybe. I do know there are security concerns with Chinese-made drones. |
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 21, 2020 6:27:05 GMT -5
Chinese affiliated drone company donated drones to aid Globalist controlled politicians, and themselves to spy on Americans. Ok, maybe. I do know there are security concerns with Chinese-made drones. don't forget Chinese made cell phones, smart tvs, ect., ect., And then there is the matter of Hillary's illegal server's direct link to Chinese intelligence, Feinstein's Chinese spy partner of 20 years, Obama's gang of Muslin Brotherhood spies he placed in areas handling our MOST secret data, for a start. |
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Apr 21, 2020 8:47:16 GMT -5
Ok, maybe. I do know there are security concerns with Chinese-made drones. don't forget Chinese made cell phones, smart tvs, ect., ect., And then there is the matter of Hillary's illegal server's direct link to Chinese intelligence, Feinstein's Chinese spy partner of 20 years, Obama's gang of Muslin Brotherhood spies he placed in areas handling our MOST secret data, for a start. Many things are at least partly "Chinese made", but if it's a non-Chinese company that owns AND exercises close control over manufacturing, it's probably ok* in terms of security. So, Apple or probably Samsung products made or assembled partly in China, ok, but the Chinese owned brand Huawei (makes phones but worse, routers and such) not so ok. The US government refuses to use Huawei communications products, presumably for good reason. You forgot software, not to mention critical manufacturing bought by China. The Opera browser originated in I think one of the Scandinavian countries, and it was pretty good. In some cases, it used a server in the middle for image re-compression or the like, which speeded up page loading if slightly at the expense of image quality. But a Chinese company bought Opera. And even if Opera's original use of a server in the middle wasn't a security problem, one can imagine that the Chinese would be tempted to take advantage. More recently, China is trying to buy one of the UK's formerly major (but financially troubled) steel producers. The Hillary server thing was BAD, and there's no knowing who might have hacked it. But even a Republican Senate committee investigating found no proof that any specific country had hacked it...although it was bad enough that there was no way to be sure they hadn't, either. The more likely (but not provably since she deleted so much) bad part was that she was probably selling us to the highest bidder, and had that server for commingling official business with donations to the Clinton Foundation, which, although it did a bit of charity, was mostly money laundering for the Clintons (who could claim huge expenses against the Foundation). Heck, politicians that never had anything but government salaries manage to get rich, you have to figure they're getting millions from someone else, not always a foreign power, but corrupt. (another reason some are crazy about one that was rich long before being elected; someone that doesn't need that kind of dirt on them puts all the dirty ones at risk) Feinstein is also very suspicious, IMO. But the ones that don't get caught quickly are very slick, and can spend an entire career selling us out without proof. And of course they cover for each other. Along those lines, you also forgot Debbie Wasserman Schultz who hired the Awan brothers (IT admins for the House Democrat computers), who may have stolen equipment, one of them was convicted of bank fraud, and who had ties to Pakistan (although there was no proof of data being stolen or their acting as foreign agents, but who knows what proof meant when the FBI was so crooked back then). Note well, I agree that many of these people are PROBABLY very dirty and MIGHT be as dirty as you think (if perhaps not quite the way you think), but the proof for that is generally either nonexistent or buried by those who play along with them. Obama had both Muslim Brotherhood affiliated and Marxists (Van Jones)/people who had voted for communists (former CIA Director! Brennan) working for him. No proof IMO that they were spies, but I can't imagine any other administration knowingly giving clearances and very sensitive positions to people with such backgrounds. Very suspicious, but NOT proof. (It seems like it was so simple in the good old days, when it was just us vs really obvious bad guys like Nazis or Soviets. Many times it was simpler, because most of the smaller players were polarized to either the US or the Soviets. Except it wasn't always simple. Consider Alan Turing, perhaps the greatest computer genius before computers were as flexible as we expect now; he defined a simple model showing how all non-quantum digital computers are alike (and a proof), defined a practical test for artificial intelligence, etc. Critical to the important Ultra intelligence against the German Enigma cipher machine, which helped win WWII (some estimates say Ultra saved 14 million lives). But later convicted and chemically castrated as a practicing homosexual, possible suicide two years later...and long after he died, the UK government apologized and QEII granted a posthumous pardon, not just to be PC, but because even though his lifestyle was vulnerable, he wasn't being blackmailed or doing anything wrong other than the acts which were then illegal but aren't now.) Lots of people that look dirty, are dirty, but not all of them; and some that are, may at least not be dirty in all the ways they look dirty. That's the problem with this stuff, it's not simple enough for quick sensationalism when you need proof so you can have that little thing (that the bad guys always fake, that's supposed to make us different from them) called a trial before you lock someone up or string them up, despite the satisfaction that just stringing up bad guys without any fuss would offer. Remember, if we did that, you could be the next bad guy just for saying something seriously unPC (worse, with PC being a moving target like in the novel 1984).
* as I said, ok in terms of security. Quality control (even safety) is another issue that needs constant attention. Manufacturers that outsourced to China learned the hard way that they had to spend part of the savings of cheap labor on quality control or they'd get very poor quality goods. That's somewhat true everywhere simply by the nature of mass production, but slave labor or near slave labor or people that have the communist work ethic (Soviet saying, but similar concept) "they pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work" is much worse than in freer places where people understand their jobs depend on the product being sold. Take for example the deadly melamine in pet food scandal (melamine fools simple tests for certain nutrients, but taken internally as a powder, is deadly; it's safe in plastic dishes, etc). And then there's the questions of having critical supply chain items made somewhere that can cut them off; or just of outsourcing all those jobs, although most people wouldn't like to pay twice as much (at least) for a high-end cell phone. On the security angle, yes, Bloomberg (magazine, not the rich politician himself) published an article saying that a lot of US company servers made in China had a spy chip in them, but that article has been repeatedly and thoroughly discredited; not EVERYTHING nasty said about bad guys is always true. And Bloomberg has other issues with their tech reporting, too. appleinsider.com/articles/19/10/04/editorial-a-year-later-bloomberg-silently-stands-by-its-big-hack-icloud-spy-chip-story |
|
