|
Post by richard on Jun 10, 2024 21:03:29 GMT -5
Well Colt, here is your big chance to see a Jackie concert, albeit remotely. But how is watching a Jackie concert remotely any different from watching a Jackie concert clip on Youtube? It's about $28 different. Seems Jackie and her team are at a point in time to try anything to milk her old OTTs for cash.
All of the big stars you can see their concerts on Youtube for free. Does this mean Mike is not going to let anyone video Jackie at 54 Below. If so they should put that on the ticket information. why would anyone pay $28 to see Jackie who has such little demand that she will be luck to fill the restaurant.
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Jun 10, 2024 21:18:02 GMT -5
But how is watching a Jackie concert remotely any different from watching a Jackie concert clip on Youtube? It's about $28 different. Seems Jackie and her team are at a point in time to try anything to milk her old OTTs for cash.
All of the big stars you can see their concerts on Youtube for free. Does this mean Mike is not going to let anyone video Jackie at 54 Below. If so they should put that on the ticket information. why would anyone pay $28 to see Jackie who has such little demand that she will be luck to fill the restaurant.
I think its smart and she should have offered remote concert options long ago. How many of her older fan base really wanted to see her in concert, but were unable or unwilling to travel. And it's not "milking" anyone for cash...it's like anything, if there is a demand for it, people will pay for it. If it's worth 28 bucks for a fan to watch her concert online, nothing wrong with that at all. I don't understand the need to put a negative spin on it, except mabye to say that it's more an act of desperation than smarts since tickets aren't selling too well. But even if that's the case, it's seems to be to be a good way to make it a more profitable event. lol
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Jun 10, 2024 21:42:03 GMT -5
Well Colt, here is your big chance to see a Jackie concert, albeit remotely. But how is watching a Jackie concert remotely any different from watching a Jackie concert clip on Youtube? Better quality video and sound. The whole concert, as much like being there as possible if actually going to certain venues is too much of a problem. Not as impactful as being there, but a lot better than phone video.
|
|
|
Post by Couch Lounge on Jun 10, 2024 21:51:55 GMT -5
Janet Devlin has been doing two online shows a month for years. It's £3 with 48-hour streaming on lounges.tv Video creator gets 80% and payout is within 24hours. Jackie could do this for some extra money. She could also do it on OnlyFans, but lounges.tv would be more respectable.
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jun 10, 2024 21:53:10 GMT -5
You see Richard you are speaking from a non - fans perspective, a lot of Jackie fans are like me who physically can’t attend a show! Some of the venues don’t allow shows to be filmed! Remember when Mike was given a hard time for filming his Daughter, he had to explain it was his daughter up there performing!
|
|
|
Post by msims on Jun 10, 2024 22:13:44 GMT -5
But how is watching a Jackie concert remotely any different from watching a Jackie concert clip on Youtube? It's about $28 different. Seems Jackie and her team are at a point in time to try anything to milk her old OTTs for cash.
All of the big stars you can see their concerts on Youtube for free. Does this mean Mike is not going to let anyone video Jackie at 54 Below. If so they should put that on the ticket information. why would anyone pay $28 to see Jackie who has such little demand that she will be luck to fill the restaurant.
Alot of big stars may be successful but they are in debt as well: TLC for example a 90's girl best selling group had to file bankruptcy. Older fans don't mind paying and for any music fan to want to watch concerts for free, sure if the artist is paid. Cue someone popping up to say everyone is doing great but Jackie.
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jun 10, 2024 23:24:46 GMT -5
I don’t begrudge Jackie making some extra money 💰! I want to wait and see how successful this is before passing judgment on if this streaming of a concert 🎵 will work or not!
|
|
|
Post by Uber Eats on Jun 10, 2024 23:28:01 GMT -5
It's about $28 different. Seems Jackie and her team are at a point in time to try anything to milk her old OTTs for cash.
All of the big stars you can see their concerts on Youtube for free. Does this mean Mike is not going to let anyone video Jackie at 54 Below. If so they should put that on the ticket information. why would anyone pay $28 to see Jackie who has such little demand that she will be luck to fill the restaurant.
Alot of big stars may be successful but they are in debt as well: TLC for example a 90's girl best selling group had to file bankruptcy. Older fans don't mind paying and for any music fan to want to watch concerts for free, sure if the artist is paid. Cue someone popping up to say everyone is doing great but Jackie.No, everyone is not doing great. Jackie in the same boat as every other musician trying to get noticed. Instant fame happened to her once and a half times, and as many times as she's tried to make it happen again, it ends up going two steps back afterward. From now on it will be a grind, and she would do well to adjust her expectations. It will be a miracle if anyone wonders who that singer is from the Muzak while they're pushing a shopping cart through the canned soup aisle. 54 Below sounds great, but it's one-off. It's a gig economy, so she's going to have to hustle for work like everyone else.
|
|
|
Post by msims on Jun 11, 2024 0:17:26 GMT -5
Perhaps promoters want to see how those gigs do before booking others, seems to be okay to me but we'll see.
One of the longest running critiques is that Jackie didn't have good management (comments still have been made about this even since after this interview posted): she has changed management according to her words in this part of the interview so please click:
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jun 11, 2024 0:43:49 GMT -5
Jackie needs to grow her fan base and she is not going to do it by charging $28 to see her perform on social media.
Yes someone with a new Iphone could take as good as video and sound as most peoples computers will handle. There are good videos of major stars concerts out there taken by people in the audience. Jackie being filmed at 54 Below would be many times easier to video than someone like Olivia that has much bigger stages and moves all around the stage. the idea with most artist seem to be let as many people as possible see their concert and that will just make them more willing to buy tickets for the next one. The public is seeing less and less of Jackie and she needs to reverse that.
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Jun 11, 2024 2:29:52 GMT -5
Jackie needs to grow her fan base and she is not going to do it by charging $28 to see her perform on social media. Yes someone with a new Iphone could take as good as video and sound as most peoples computers will handle. There are good videos of major stars concerts out there taken by people in the audience. Jackie being filmed at 54 Below would be many times easier to video than someone like Olivia that has much bigger stages and moves all around the stage. the idea with most artist seem to be let as many people as possible see their concert and that will just make them more willing to buy tickets for the next one. The public is seeing less and less of Jackie and she needs to reverse that. Have you no answer other than pound social media senseless, or post high quality free content often?
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jun 11, 2024 7:27:19 GMT -5
You’re so busy recording a concert you can’t just sit back and enjoy the show! Personally I wouldn’t want to film a concert ! I would rather sit back and enjoy the concert!
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jun 11, 2024 8:49:59 GMT -5
Jackie needs to grow her fan base and she is not going to do it by charging $28 to see her perform on social media. Yes someone with a new Iphone could take as good as video and sound as most peoples computers will handle. There are good videos of major stars concerts out there taken by people in the audience. Jackie being filmed at 54 Below would be many times easier to video than someone like Olivia that has much bigger stages and moves all around the stage. the idea with most artist seem to be let as many people as possible see their concert and that will just make them more willing to buy tickets for the next one. The public is seeing less and less of Jackie and she needs to reverse that. Have you no answer other than pound social media senseless, or post high quality free content often? I have made many suggestions along with some others on this site, and in today's world social media is the biggest player. Why do you think all the stars both big and small make Youtube music videos and have their own channel, and yes youtube is just one part of social media.
Jackie has done some very good interviews lately on social media but with people with very small platforms. We have named several large platforms that could work for her, someone with 2k subscribers isn't going to cut it.
What is there left with out social media except for an occasional TV shows like the Tonight Show and Saturday Night Live. But good luck for Jackie getting on one of those.
Maybe you forgot it was Jackie's youtube site that got her on America's Got Talent in the first place after failing to get on a couple of times.
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Jun 11, 2024 9:01:29 GMT -5
You’re so busy recording a concert you can’t just sit back and enjoy the show! Personally I wouldn’t want to film a concert ! I would rather sit back and enjoy the concert! Believe it or not, you can do both. When I recorded all of that Nashville concert footage, I used a GoPro, which is really small and emitted no light. I just held it with one hand about chest high and then watched the concert. lol
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jun 11, 2024 9:46:48 GMT -5
Good for you Donkey, I would rather pay to see a live streaming to see Jackie ! Every dollar 💵 counts!
|
|