|
Post by Guest 5 on Apr 9, 2020 15:17:42 GMT -5
it is too bad that this site has come to the point where the free flow of ideas is not accepted You are always welcome to use the unmoderated political forums. Well, at least you admit that you will only accept views that agree with your limited view of the world. I guess that's a way to stay closed-minded.
|
|
|
Post by Just Somebody on Apr 9, 2020 15:40:25 GMT -5
You misunderstand the news process ... I call BS on every "point" you think you are making. I don't say you are lying, because I believe you are as simple minded and brainwashed as all those deceived by the Globalist propaganda. "Every" point? Every point is BS? Every? Your posts are nothing but one-liners sprinkled with absolutes and insults: All. Lying. Simple minded. Brainwashed. Globalist. Propaganda. No credibility. Idiot. I call BS on your use of the phrase "call BS" so soon after I posted a link to calling BS on BS. Yes, common phrase, but you do have a habit of deflecting and throwing phrases back at people. If someone calls your hero something, you add that to your bag of insults for later posts. Oh yeah! THAT's YOU! A child's defense to everything. I came to this forum to discuss Jackie, not to argue with you, but you're the one person on this forum that I couldn't give a rat's ass if I make an enemy of. I stay silent while you rant, but don't think for a minute that I'm moved in one direction or another by any of the crap that you spew here. [/end of pissing contest]
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Apr 9, 2020 15:47:20 GMT -5
You are always welcome to use the unmoderated political forums. Well, at least you admit that you will only accept views that agree with your limited view of the world. I guess that's a way to stay closed-minded. You allow druggies to shoot up in public, people to sh!t on your sidewalk, and steal up to $950.00 cash or goods at a time, but you draw the line at anyone posting anything you disagree with here. You obviously misunderstand. Whether I agree or disagree is entirely irrelevant. The title of this forum is Mainstream Political Forum. If you read the rules of the forum, you would have realized that non-mainstream political posts don't belong here because they are off topic. If it is close-minded to reject off-topic posts that violate the rules of this forum, then I am indeed close-minded. You claim you want the free flow in ideas as in Amazon. We have unmoderated Political Forums for precisely that purpose. Why do you complain about having your off-topic posts denied in this forum when there are other forums created specifically for those posts?
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Apr 9, 2020 15:54:03 GMT -5
I call BS on every "point" you think you are making. I don't say you are lying, because I believe you are as simple minded and brainwashed as all those deceived by the Globalist propaganda. "Every" point? Every point is BS? Every? Your posts are nothing but one-liners sprinkled with absolutes and insults: All. Lying. Simple minded. Brainwashed. Globalist. Propaganda. No credibility. Idiot. I call BS on your use of the phrase "call BS" so soon after I posted a link to calling BS on BS. Yes, common phrase, but you do have a habit of deflecting and throwing phrases back at people. If someone calls your hero something, you add that to your bag of insults for later posts. Oh yeah! THAT's YOU! A child's defense to everything. I came to this forum to discuss Jackie, not to argue with you, but you're the one person on this forum that I couldn't give a rat's ass if I make an enemy of. I stay silent while you rant, but don't think for a minute that I'm moved in one direction or another by any of the crap that you spew here. [/end of pissing contest] As I have posted recently, I will be deleting most "Globalist" posts because they are non-mainstream and therefore off topic for this forum. That is why I created this moderated mainstream politics forum - to reduce pissing contests. It may take a couple of days but we'll get there.
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Apr 9, 2020 16:03:55 GMT -5
How do you know that locking her up isn't mainstream? Because I don't read much about locking up Hillary in the NY Times or the other mainstream media I have listed. "As for why the President didn't pursue it, think. I'm not an idiot and neither is he. The outcry from the left would be deafening. They'd want to impeach him for it." Trump has nothing to fear - they tried impeaching him and they failed. The reason Trump did not lock up Hillary was not the fear of impeachment. "Anyone who commits a crime like she did should be locked up, and most are." For better or worse, that is not what the mainstream believes.
|
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 9, 2020 16:18:39 GMT -5
I call BS on every "point" you think you are making. I don't say you are lying, because I believe you are as simple minded and brainwashed as all those deceived by the Globalist propaganda. Fool! I am the one who wrote all the Globalist propaganda. Playing along with your false claim, what did write in reply to the following questions? Why did [Pelosi] hold until Jan 15th to send the articles of impeachment to Senate? What was the 'release' marker she waited for? Was it for time to neg Senate witness/process? What if 'impeachment' was meant to fail? What if 'impeachment' was meant to distract from overseas developments? What did ALL US MEDIA focus on during 'impeachment' process? How do you stop POTUS rally(s)? How do you cancel POTUS econ gains? How do you cancel POTUS unemployment gains? How do you stop POTUS-CHINA trade neg? How do you keep BIDEN from needing to take part in debates? How do you limit BIDEN public appearances? How do you limit BIDEN live interviews? How do you stop Hunter BIDEN Ukraine/China MSM coverage? HOW DO YOU CHANGE THE NARRATIVE? WHO BENEFITS THE MOST? How do you ALTER POTUS-BIDEN debate structure? How do you HOLD HOSTAGE PUBLIC AID in exchange for National 'ballot harvesting' law adopt?
|
|
|
Post by 1 Guest on Apr 9, 2020 16:20:24 GMT -5
How do you know that locking her up isn't mainstream? Because I don't read much about locking up Hillary in the NY Times or the other mainstream media I have listed. "As for why the President didn't pursue it, think. I'm not an idiot and neither is he. The outcry from the left would be deafening. They'd want to impeach him for it." Trump has nothing to fear - they tried impeaching him and they failed. The reason Trump did not lock up Hillary was not the fear of impeachment. "Anyone who commits a crime like she did should be locked up, and most are." For better or worse, that is not what the mainstream believes. BS. Of course you wouldn't read it in the NY Times, but that doesn't mean that she didn't do what she did. You know what she did. You didn't need to read it in the NY Times rag. And you know full well that what she did was a crime that's punishable with prison even though the NY Times didn't say so.
|
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 9, 2020 16:46:54 GMT -5
United States Attorney General pattern of events... to sabotage the presidency”
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Apr 9, 2020 16:52:37 GMT -5
Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberg Organization ... Please provide a link to where you got this information.
|
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 9, 2020 16:58:09 GMT -5
|
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 9, 2020 17:04:13 GMT -5
Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberg Organization ... Please provide a link to where you got this information. I actually read it at several sites, just google. Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberg Organization May 23, 1992 and pick some.
|
|
|
Post by Guest 5 on Apr 9, 2020 17:14:44 GMT -5
Well, at least you admit that you will only accept views that agree with your limited view of the world. I guess that's a way to stay closed-minded. You allow druggies to shoot up in public, people to sh!t on your sidewalk, and steal up to $950.00 cash or goods at a time, but you draw the line at anyone posting anything you disagree with here. You obviously misunderstand. Whether I agree or disagree is entirely irrelevant. The title of this forum is Mainstream Political Forum. If you read the rules of the forum, you would have realized that non-mainstream political posts don't belong here because they are off topic. If it is close-minded to reject off-topic posts that violate the rules of this forum, then I am indeed close-minded. You claim you want the free flow in ideas as in Amazon. We have unmoderated Political Forums for precisely that purpose. Why do you complain about having your off-topic posts denied in this forum when there are other forums created specifically for those posts? OK, I think I misunderstood the purpose of the new forum. But just so I understand, is it OK to post information from alternative new sources in the unmoderated political forums? Thanks
|
|
djt2020
Political Only
Posts: 1,597
|
Post by djt2020 on Apr 9, 2020 17:20:53 GMT -5
CBS has now been caught for a second time broadcasting misleading hospital footage during the coronavirus pandemic.
About two weeks ago, on March 22, CBS News used deceptively-edited footage the first time. CBS News was caught red-handed using chaotic footage from an Italian hospital in a story about New York City hospitals.
Then CBS News explained unconvincingly, “It was an editing mistake. We took immediate steps to remove it from all platforms and shows,”.
Main Stream Media’s coronavirus agenda is obvious, create fear, and inflate the death count. To this end they also actively discourage those suffering from the Chinese virus from taking perfectly safe anti-malaria drugs.
Simply put, the more Americans who die, the more it hurts President Trump’s 2020 reelection chances.
Over the weekend, CBS News again used this video to mislead its viewers, this time while talking about a Philadelphia hospital.
EDIT: This Thread is a joke. Later
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Apr 9, 2020 17:28:43 GMT -5
Please provide a link to where you got this information. I actually read it at several sites, just google. Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberg Organization May 23, 1992 and pick some. I googled it and found it in a non-mainstream website. If you cannot produce a mainstream link, I will delete the post. All quotes and links promoting conspiracy theories must come from mainstream sources.
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Apr 9, 2020 17:36:33 GMT -5
But just so I understand, is it OK to post information from alternative new sources in the unmoderated political forums? That would be absolutely fine. It is the reason the unmoderated forums are there.
|
|