|
Post by eulenspiegel on Jul 1, 2024 6:11:38 GMT -5
Coldplay feat. Michael J. Fox
Fix you
Glastonburry 2024
|
|
|
Post by ChrisR on Jul 1, 2024 6:15:00 GMT -5
That would have been mentioned at the time. The E's as well as OTTs never missed a bragging opportunity, so if in fact Disney wanted her for something, they would have trumpeted that across the galaxy. The OTTs always thought that whenever Jackie did something new, she was going to win some big award. Realism was never in the cards for most of them.
|
|
|
Post by msims on Jul 1, 2024 6:30:12 GMT -5
Its no ones business what anyone does to themselves. All the posts though about Juliet are projecting Caz's story onto Juliet. It's a parent's job to protect their children, not only from others, but from themselves. If you saw your kid stabbing himself, you would say, "hey kid, it's no one's business what you do, so stab away." Sims, you're nuts. According to your logic, no one here is a Jackie fan but you. It appears that Caz and friends will continue to torture you well into the future. You've made no progress in convincing anyone to become like you, so be ready for more frustration. It certainly will be entertaining! You are textbook. You are torturing yourself whenever something positive happens to Jackie, you take a hit of bath salts and off you go. You are jealous of Juliet because she has/had the support of her family, you did not have that support and thats not Jackie or Juliet's problem or mine, its yours. Me convince someone of what? Ive always posted the facts. If someone doesnt want to believe the facts, thats not my problem. For your own sanity I suggest moving on but first get that colonoscopy you been putting off Caz, as im sure they will find your head stuck up there and then you can go frollick.
|
|
|
Post by msims on Jul 1, 2024 6:34:11 GMT -5
That would have been mentioned at the time. The E's as well as OTTs never missed a bragging opportunity, so if in fact Disney wanted her for something, they would have trumpeted that across the galaxy. The OTTs always thought that whenever Jackie did something new, she was going to win some big award. Realism was never in the cards for most of them. Speaking of awards:
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jul 1, 2024 8:11:48 GMT -5
And Jackie critics will never stop 🛑 criticizing!
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jul 1, 2024 8:16:14 GMT -5
Donkey, so Disney didn’t want Jackie even fresh off her AGT APPEARANCE, YOU MEAN THEY COULD NOT HAVE FOUND A PART FOR HER EVEN IF IT WAS JUST TO SING WITH NO ACTING INVOLVED?
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Jul 1, 2024 8:50:19 GMT -5
Donkey, so Disney didn’t want Jackie even fresh off her AGT APPEARANCE, YOU MEAN THEY COULD NOT HAVE FOUND A PART FOR HER EVEN IF IT WAS JUST TO SING WITH NO ACTING INVOLVED? Well, I guess they did find a small part for her...see socals post about where she made that small appearance of a Disney t.v. show. lol
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Jul 1, 2024 8:51:13 GMT -5
Jackie's acting role in The Company You Keep was not demanding enough to determine whether or not she had any acting ability. To me that's kind of the point. It wasn't a big role, and yet I could still see that she wasn't particularly talented in the acting arena. She didn't even convince me in the small role she had.
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Jul 1, 2024 8:53:07 GMT -5
Coldplay feat. Michael J. Fox Fix you Glastonburry 2024 MJ Fox is a winner.
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Jul 1, 2024 8:56:46 GMT -5
Thanks for posting that Donk, the video and sound quality was excellent. As I commented on video..what about naming venue and pianist in title? I named the venue, just not in the title. "Jackie Evancho - location - date"...that's the naming convention I use on YT. And Jorn is awesome, but shouldn't be in the title. I should mention him though, he does a fabulous job...good point there. I added a shout out to him in the description. I do follow him on YT...he's pretty cool.
|
|
|
Post by msims on Jul 1, 2024 8:57:34 GMT -5
Jackie's acting role in The Company You Keep was not demanding enough to determine whether or not she had any acting ability. To me that's kind of the point. It wasn't a big role, and yet I could still see that she wasn't particularly talented in the acting arena. She didn't even convince me in the small role she had. By your own admission you were not around at that time not until 2013 so why does it matter whether you were convinced or not?
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Jul 1, 2024 9:02:28 GMT -5
To me that's kind of the point. It wasn't a big role, and yet I could still see that she wasn't particularly talented in the acting arena. She didn't even convince me in the small role she had. By your own admission you were not around at that time not until 2013 so why does it matter whether you were convinced or not? When I started following Jackie post AGT is irrelevant as to what I think of her acting in the movie...I've seen her acting in the movie either way. LoL Look, she was very cute, did her best, and could only do what she could do with no acting experience, no training, and very little natural acting ability. It's not her fault...she should have accepted the role...it was a great opportunity. But there is a reason she was never asked to be in another movie again, despite her regular assertions that she would love to be in more movies.
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Jul 1, 2024 9:03:43 GMT -5
And Jackie critics will never stop 🛑 criticizing! And you will never stop 🛑 criticizing them!
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Jul 1, 2024 9:11:28 GMT -5
there is a reason she was never asked to be in another movie again, despite her regular assertions that she would love to be in more movies. Apparently it takes more to launch a career in movies than making regular assertions that one would love to be in movies.
|
|
|
Post by msims on Jul 1, 2024 9:12:01 GMT -5
By your own admission you were not around at that time not until 2013 so why does it matter whether you were convinced or not? When I started following Jackie post AGT is irrelevant as to what I think of her acting in the movie...I've seen her acting in the movie either way. LoL Look, she was very cute, did her best, and could only do what she could do with no acting experience, no training, and very little natural acting ability. It's not her fault...she should have accepted the role...it was a great opportunity. But there is a reason she was never asked to be in another movie again, despite her regular assertions that she would love to be in more movies. Jackie's role was to act the daughter of a 76 year old, you cannot even play the role of a Jackie fan. You argue against giving the credit of the man Jorn Swart who accompanied her both nights for 90 minutes. Why do you think you're a fan? Because you paid 28 bucks? All that is required to being a fan is not being an idiot. Its not hard.
|
|