|
Post by donkey on Jul 19, 2024 14:48:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jul 19, 2024 15:10:25 GMT -5
Looking forward to hearing the interview with Jackie!
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jul 19, 2024 15:14:45 GMT -5
Jackie needs someone new and hip to help her with her music, not someone who hasn’t been relevant in decades!
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Jul 19, 2024 15:22:32 GMT -5
1. Which Sunday? This Sunday? No date specified. No link to interview specified. 2. Is this only broadcast at a specific date and time? Why not leave it up on Youtube so anybody can watch it at any time? Forcing people to watch at a specific time only limits the audience.
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jul 19, 2024 15:33:54 GMT -5
Disappointed I am tired of your constant discourse when talking about Jackie, but you go ahead and continue your personal attacks nobody in this forum wants to stop you! You have that right just like I have the right to say nice things about Jackie!
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jul 19, 2024 15:38:30 GMT -5
This Sunday I believe is the interview with Jackie! Hey a lot of interviews have been done with artists on a particular network don’t just single Jackie out !
|
|
|
Post by donkey on Jul 19, 2024 15:51:08 GMT -5
1. Which Sunday? This Sunday? No date specified. No link to interview specified. 2. Is this only broadcast at a specific date and time? Why not leave it up on Youtube so anybody can watch it at any time? Forcing people to watch at a specific time only limits the audience. 1. She's implying it's this coming Sunday 2. Jackie has always been bad at maximizing social media to advertise herself...I've never understood why.
|
|
|
Post by colt46 on Jul 19, 2024 16:03:16 GMT -5
Jackie was taught by dear old dad on all things about her career , a failed business owner, so what can you expect ! Parents are not the ones you need to advance your career! You need good proven management! Unfortunately Jackie is continuing the same failed policies that were used when she was not an adult! Maybe someday Jackie will wake up and get proper management!
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Jul 19, 2024 17:06:03 GMT -5
She's implying it's this coming Sunday The reason why I'm not sure is because I can't find any reference to it on Maurice Bendard's instagram or Youtube accounts: www.instagram.com/mauricebenard/www.youtube.com/@mbstateofmind/So can it be that Jackie is promoting the interview but Maurice himself cannot be bothered to do so?
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jul 19, 2024 18:21:39 GMT -5
She's implying it's this coming Sunday The reason why I'm not sure is because I can't find any reference to it on Maurice Bendard's instagram or Youtube accounts: www.instagram.com/mauricebenard/www.youtube.com/@mbstateofmind/So can it be that Jackie is promoting the interview but Maurice himself cannot be bothered to do so? It's on his instagram stories.
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Jul 19, 2024 18:35:18 GMT -5
A panel of genuine experts (not the idiots judging TV "talent" shows) can approximate quantifying talent or other supposed intangibles. The problem is the majority of people either are idiots themselves, or are entertained by idiots like those TV judges. Since the quality of talent and art are undefinable and unquantifiable, it is also impossible to define "experts". Who would be qualified to pick these "experts"? Art critics, music critics, movie critics are all "experts" who are hired by newspaper editors but there are no standards to pick who these hiring editors are. It is all an arbitrary deck of cards. Which is why on Rotten Tomatoes there are lots of opposing "expert" opinions on the same movie. Art is undefinable and arbitrary. It fricken' well isn't. If someone is off pitch, they're off pitch. If their phrasing or timing is atrocious, that's obvious. These are just about measurable by a computer, save that purposely altering the timing could be effective in ways a computer might have difficulty identifying. Not all critics are experts, except at describing why they like or don't like something in terms that others might relate to; that's all a critic really has to do, outside of classical music, where they ought to be a subject expert too. An expert in evaluating something knows enough to understand how it was created or performed and to a large degree why it was the way it was. I saw a YouTube video awhile back that dissected the composition of some popular song (I forget what now) in terms of far more advanced music theory than one might have casually anticipated went into its composition. Some things are inborn talent, and some learned. Quite a lot of technique and composition can be taught. If something can be taught, it can be identified and evaluated, too. "this is well done" and "I like this" are NOT equivalent statements. You or I might dislike something and yet acknowledge that it was very well done for what it was; or vice versa, like something despite being only marginally well done. There are formulas for what people will probably like, but they only go so far. There are definitely methods for doing something well - some mix of talent and training of one sort or another, and hard work. What goes on inside our heads, until we express it, is subjective, Anything that more than one person can observe, even though they necessarily observe it from non identical perspectives, is objective. And nearly anything objective can be analyzed. That may get a bit interesting if one has to choose applicable standards for the particular content, but it's still possible. There are those who say that musical notation can't entirely describe jazz. Maybe not, but one can play jazz on MIDI capable instruments and have that capture by computer. And the computer can play that back with its own versions of the synth for those instruments, or with swapped instruments, etc; but all the timing and bent notes etc will have been captured. So it's still a specific, analyze-able notation of sorts. Perhaps at the far extremes, not everything can be analyzed; maybe Gödel's incompleteness theorems apply; and at the subatomic level, the uncertainty principle applies. But short of that, if it's external, it's subject to objective evaluation (approximately repeatable by different people capable of it) if there is general agreement on the method of evaluation.
|
|
|
Post by BOGC on Jul 19, 2024 18:38:11 GMT -5
Jackie was taught by dear old dad on all things about her career , a failed business owner, so what can you expect ! Parents are not the ones you need to advance your career! You need good proven management! Unfortunately Jackie is continuing the same failed policies that were used when she was not an adult! Maybe someday Jackie will wake up and get proper management! That wasn't the only time he was self-employed, although the earlier occasions might have effectively been as a contractor rather than business owner. Most startups fail, that's not a critique of someone's skills. The valuable part is simply the idea and confidence to work for oneself rather than for some other company.
|
|
|
Post by Socal Fan on Jul 19, 2024 19:24:10 GMT -5
It's [Jackie interview] on his [Maurice Benard] instagram stories. I believe Instagram stories exist for only 24 hours. So did Maurice Benard only promote it for 24 hours?
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jul 19, 2024 19:35:39 GMT -5
It's [Jackie interview] on his [Maurice Benard] instagram stories. I believe Instagram stories exist for only 24 hours. So did Maurice Benard only promote it for 24 hours? It is still on his stories but I don't know for how long that is why I post pictures of someone stories. Just go to his site and click on the big circle with his face at the top of his page. It the last segment of his stories.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Jul 19, 2024 19:49:48 GMT -5
|
|